Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1964

Supreme Court of India · 1964-11-23

HAMDARD DWAKHANA (WAKE), DELHI & ANR. vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
SC 1964/90460
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HAMDARD DWAKHANA (WAKE), DELHI & ANR.
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Author
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (),HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAHC.,SIKRI, S.M.,BACHAWAT, R.S.
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAH, J.C.,SIKRI, S.M.,BACHAWAT, R.S.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Fruit Products Order, 1955, under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, affirming that 'Sharbat Rooh Afza' qualifies as a fruit product as per Clause 2(d) of the Order. The Court rejected the appellants' argument that the order should have been issued under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, stating that the regulations were within the purview of Section 3(1) of the Essential Commodities Act. The Court also found that the restrictions imposed were reasonable and constitutionally valid, thereby dismissing the appeal.

HAMDARD DWAKHANA (WAKE), DELHI & ANR. vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS · Niyam