Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1964

Supreme Court of India · 1964-11-09

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS vs K. H. CHAMBERS, MADRAS

Citation / case number
SC 1963/292
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS
Respondent
K. H. CHAMBERS, MADRAS
Bench
SUBBARAO

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 25(4) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, clarifying that 'succession' involves a complete transfer of ownership where the transferor exits and the transferee assumes control, preserving the business's identity and continuity. The Court held that the High Court has jurisdiction under Section 66(1) to review findings on succession, affirming that the determination of whether facts meet the legal criteria for succession is a mixed question of law and fact. The appeal was allowed, confirming the applicability of Section 25(4) to the case at hand.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS vs K. H. CHAMBERS, MADRAS · Niyam