Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1964

Supreme Court of India · 1964-03-09

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. vs AUDH NARAIN SINGH AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1963/81
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.
Respondent
AUDH NARAIN SINGH AND ANR.
Author
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (),WANCHOO, K.N.,SHAHC.,AYYANGAR, N. RAJAGOPALA,SIKRI, S.M.
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),WANCHOO, K.N.,SHAH, J.C.,AYYANGAR, N. RAJAGOPALA,SIKRI, S.M.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that a Tahvildar in the Cash Department of the Uttar Pradesh Government is a civil servant under Article 311(2) of the Constitution. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision that the termination of the respondent's services was invalid due to non-compliance with the procedural safeguards mandated by Article 311(2). The judgment emphasized that the relationship of master and servant is determined by various factors, including control over work and payment of remuneration, which were present in this case.

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. vs AUDH NARAIN SINGH AND ANR. · Niyam