Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1964

Supreme Court of India · 1964-01-29

K. C. THOMAS, FIRST INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BOMBAY vs VASANT HIRALAL SHAH & ORS.

Citation / case number
SC 1962/121
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
K. C. THOMAS, FIRST INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BOMBAY
Respondent
VASANT HIRALAL SHAH & ORS.
Bench
SINHA, BHUVNESHWAR P.(CJ),SUBBARAO, K.,DAYAL, RAGHUBAR,AYYANGAR, N. RAJAGOPALA,MUDHOLKAR, J.R.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 34(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the requirement for obtaining sanction from the Central Board of Revenue applies only when a notice is issued under clause (ii) of the proviso, which pertains to escaped income exceeding one lakh rupees. In this case, since the escaped income was below one lakh and more than eight years had elapsed since the assessment year, the notice was valid as it was issued under a different provision with the necessary sanction from the Commissioner. The Court held that the High Court erred in its interpretation of the applicability of the second proviso to Section 34(3).

K. C. THOMAS, FIRST INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BOMBAY vs VASANT HIRALAL SHAH & ORS. · Niyam