Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1964

Supreme Court of India · 1964-02-12

JAGDEV SINGH SIDHANTI vs PRATAP SINGH DAULTA

Citation / case number
SC 1963/88
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
JAGDEV SINGH SIDHANTI
Respondent
PRATAP SINGH DAULTA
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),WANCHOO, K.N.,GUPTA, K.C. DAS,SHAH, J.C.,AYYANGAR, N. RAJAGOPALA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the use of religious symbols or appeals to religion or language in elections, as per Section 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, constitutes a corrupt practice only if done by the candidate or with their consent. The Court clarified that while 'Om' has spiritual significance, its use on a flag does not qualify as a religious symbol under Section 123. Furthermore, the Court emphasized that political agitation for the conservation of language is a fundamental right under Article 29(1) and cannot be deemed a corrupt practice. The High Court's ruling declaring the election void was overturned.

JAGDEV SINGH SIDHANTI vs PRATAP SINGH DAULTA · Niyam