Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1964

Supreme Court of India · 1964-12-01

KYLASA SARABHIAH, BOMBAY CLOTH SHOP,SECUNDERABAD vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ANDHRA PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 1964/90456
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KYLASA SARABHIAH, BOMBAY CLOTH SHOP,SECUNDERABAD
Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ANDHRA PRADESH
Author
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (),HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAHC.,SIKRI, S.M.,BACHAWAT, R.S.
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAH, J.C.,SIKRI, S.M.,BACHAWAT, R.S.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 26-A of the Income Tax Act, 1922, if the statutory conditions for registration of a firm are met, the Income Tax Officer cannot reject the application based on stipulations not included in the partnership agreement. The Court clarified that 'specify' in this context means to mention or describe in detail, not necessarily in fractional shares. The appeal was allowed, overturning the lower courts' decisions that denied registration due to the partnership deed's deficiencies.

KYLASA SARABHIAH, BOMBAY CLOTH SHOP,SECUNDERABAD vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ANDHRA PRADESH · Niyam