Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1964

Supreme Court of India · 1964-12-10

B. N. TIWARI vs UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

Citation / case number
SC 1964/90449
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B. N. TIWARI
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Author
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (),WANCHOO, K.N.,SHAHC.,AYYANGAR, N. RAJAGOPALA,SIKRI, S.M.
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),WANCHOO, K.N.,SHAH, J.C.,AYYANGAR, N. RAJAGOPALA,SIKRI, S.M.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the 1952 'carry forward' rule for reservations in public services ceased to exist upon its substitution by the 1955 rule, which was later declared unconstitutional in Devadasan's case. Consequently, there was no valid 'carry forward' rule in 1960 when the petitioner appeared for the examination, and thus he could not claim appointment based on his rank. The Court clarified that the reservation percentages for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes remained intact and were to be applied, resulting in the petitioner not qualifying for the position due to insufficient unreserved vacancies.

B. N. TIWARI vs UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS · Niyam