Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1964

Supreme Court of India · 1964-12-14

GULABCHAND CHHOTALAL PARIKH vs STATE OF BOMBAY (NOW GUJARAT)

Citation / case number
SC 1963/277
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GULABCHAND CHHOTALAL PARIKH
Respondent
STATE OF BOMBAY (NOW GUJARAT)
Author
SARKAR, A.K.,SUBBARAO, K.,DAYAL, RAGHUBAR,AYYANGAR, N. RAJAGOPALA,MUDHOLKARR.
Bench
SARKAR, A.K.,SUBBARAO, K.,DAYAL, RAGHUBAR,AYYANGAR, N. RAJAGOPALA,MUDHOLKAR, J.R.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that a decision of the High Court on a writ petition under Article 226, made after full contest, operates as res judicata in a subsequent regular suit between the same parties regarding the same matter. The Court clarified that the provisions of Section 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, are not exhaustive, and any previous decision on a matter decided after full contest will operate as res judicata, regardless of the nature of the former proceeding. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' rulings that the suit was barred by res judicata.

GULABCHAND CHHOTALAL PARIKH vs STATE OF BOMBAY (NOW GUJARAT) · Niyam