Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1964

Supreme Court of India · 1964-08-14

BISWANATH PRASAD vs UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

Citation / case number
SC 1964/90252
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BISWANATH PRASAD
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Author
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (),HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAHC.,DAYAL, RAGHUBAR,SIKRI, S.M.
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B. (CJ),HIDAYATULLAH, M.,SHAH, J.C.,DAYAL, RAGHUBAR,SIKRI, S.M.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the notifications under Section 4(1) of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957, were valid and not vitiated by mala fides, despite delays in processing the petitioner's objections. The Court affirmed that Rule 39 of the Coal Mines (Conservation and Safety) Rules, 1954, was validly enacted under Section 17 of the Coal Mines (Conservation and Safety) Act, 1952, and aimed at ensuring coal conservation. The petitioner’s claims regarding the ultra vires nature of the rules and mala fide refusal of permission to open the colliery were rejected, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

BISWANATH PRASAD vs UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS · Niyam