Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1964

Supreme Court of India · 1964-08-17

BALMUKAND vs DIST. MAGISTRATE, DELHI & ANOTHER

Citation / case number
SC 1964/90251
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BALMUKAND
Respondent
DIST. MAGISTRATE, DELHI & ANOTHER
Bench
DAYAL, RAGHUBAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Rule 30A of the Defence of India Rules, 1962, the review of a detention order must occur at intervals of not more than six months from the date of the original detention order, rather than from the date of confirmation of that order. The Court emphasized that the review process is critical for safeguarding individual liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. The petitioner's detention was deemed to require timely review, and the Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, reinforcing the necessity of adhering to the stipulated review period.

BALMUKAND vs DIST. MAGISTRATE, DELHI & ANOTHER · Niyam