Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1964

Supreme Court of India · 1964-04-30

S. S. GADGIL, INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BOMBAY vs LAL AND COMPANY

Citation / case number
SC 1963/34
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
S. S. GADGIL, INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BOMBAY
Respondent
LAL AND COMPANY
Bench
SHAH, J.C.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the Income-tax Officer's notice issued under Section 34 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, was barred as it was issued after the expiry of the one-year limit for assessment, despite an amendment extending the period to two years. The Court held that the amendment could not be applied retrospectively to allow the issuance of the notice, as the authority to issue such notice had lapsed before the amendment came into effect. Thus, the proceedings initiated by the Income-tax Officer were invalid.

S. S. GADGIL, INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BOMBAY vs LAL AND COMPANY · Niyam