Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1963

Supreme Court of India · 1963-12-10

BHUSAWAL BOROUGH MUNICIPALITY vs AMALGAMATED ELECTRICITY CO. LTD. &ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 1961/183
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BHUSAWAL BOROUGH MUNICIPALITY
Respondent
AMALGAMATED ELECTRICITY CO. LTD. &ANR.
Bench
MUDHOLKAR, J.R.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Municipality was not entitled to claim a refund of electricity charges paid under protest, as the dispute had been conclusively decided by the Government of Bombay under the second proviso to clause 5 of the Surcharge Order, 1944. The Court clarified that the communication dated May 22, 1946, constituted a final decision binding on both parties, and that such disputes could be referred by either party. The High Court's dismissal of the Municipality's claims was upheld, confirming the finality of the Government's decision.

BHUSAWAL BOROUGH MUNICIPALITY vs AMALGAMATED ELECTRICITY CO. LTD. &ANR. · Niyam