Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1962

Supreme Court of India · 1962-10-10

M/s. BHIKUSA YAMASA KAHATRIYA vs SANGAMNER AKOLA TALUKA BIDIKAMGAR UNION

Citation / case number
SC 1961/21
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/s. BHIKUSA YAMASA KAHATRIYA
Respondent
SANGAMNER AKOLA TALUKA BIDIKAMGAR UNION
Bench
SINHA, BHUVNESHWAR P.(CJ),GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B.,WANCHOO, K.N.,GUPTA, K.C. DAS,SHAH, J.C.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 3(3)(iv) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, which allows the government to fix different minimum wage rates for different localities. The Court ruled that this provision does not confer arbitrary powers to the government, as it is guided by the principles inherent in the Act. The notification issued by the Government of Bombay on April 19, 1955, was found valid, as it complied with statutory requirements and was based on thorough inquiries, despite the absence of employer representation on the Advisory Board not affecting its validity.

M/s. BHIKUSA YAMASA KAHATRIYA vs SANGAMNER AKOLA TALUKA BIDIKAMGAR UNION · Niyam