Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1962

Supreme Court of India · 1962-11-19

RAJA MUVVA GOPALAKRISHNAYACHENDRA AND OTHERS vs RAJA V. V. SARVAGNA KRISHNA YACHENDRA AND OTHERS (And

Citation / case number
SC 1961/9
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAJA MUVVA GOPALAKRISHNAYACHENDRA AND OTHERS
Respondent
RAJA V. V. SARVAGNA KRISHNA YACHENDRA AND OTHERS (And
Author
DAS, S.K.,KAPURL.,SARKAR, A.K.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,DAYAL, RAGHUBAR
Bench
DAS, S.K.,KAPUR, J.L.,SARKAR, A.K.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,DAYAL, RAGHUBAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the impartible estate of Venkatagiri vested in the Government under the Madras Estates (Abolition & Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948, and that the compensation distribution must follow Section 45(2) of the Act. The Court ruled that the legislation was valid under Entry 9 of List 2 of the Seventh Schedule and did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. It was determined that the appellants were maintenance holders, not creditors, and that liabilities to the Government must be deducted from the compensation before distribution.

RAJA MUVVA GOPALAKRISHNAYACHENDRA AND OTHERS vs RAJA V. V. SARVAGNA KRISHNA YACHENDRA AND OTHERS (And · Niyam