Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1962

Supreme Court of India · 1962-11-20

H. H. SUDHUNDRA THIRTHA SWAMIAR. vs COMMISSIONER FOR HINDU RELIGIOUS& CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS,MY

Citation / case number
SC 1961/8
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
H. H. SUDHUNDRA THIRTHA SWAMIAR.
Respondent
COMMISSIONER FOR HINDU RELIGIOUS& CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS,MY
Bench
SINHA, BHUVNESHWAR P.(CJ),GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B.,WANCHOO, K.N.,GUPTA, K.C. DAS,SHAH, J.C.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Mahant of a Math is not merely a manager but has obligations akin to a trustee, thus his rights over Math property are protected under Article 19(1)(f) of the Constitution. The Court found that unreasonable restrictions on a Mahant's rights, which do not serve public interest, are void. The validity of certain sections of the Madras Religious Endowments Act, 1951, was upheld, while others were declared ultra vires, reaffirming the Mahant's authority to manage Math property without personal misuse.

H. H. SUDHUNDRA THIRTHA SWAMIAR. vs COMMISSIONER FOR HINDU RELIGIOUS& CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS,MY · Niyam