Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1962

Supreme Court of India · 1962-11-19

A. L. V. R. S. T. VEERAPPA CHETTIAR vs S. MICHAEL ETC.

Citation / case number
SC 1960/77
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
A. L. V. R. S. T. VEERAPPA CHETTIAR
Respondent
S. MICHAEL ETC.
Author
K. SUBBARAO
Bench
K. SUBBARAO

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the marriage of Bangaru Ammal was in Brahma form and not Asura form, emphasizing the presumption in Hindu Law that every marriage is Brahma unless proven otherwise. The court found no evidence of customary practices supporting the claim of Asura marriage, as the bridegroom's party incurred minimal expenses compared to the bride's father's significant contributions. The court established that the essence of Asura marriage involves a sale of the bride for a price, which was not the case here, thus affirming the validity of the marriage under Brahma form principles.

A. L. V. R. S. T. VEERAPPA CHETTIAR vs S. MICHAEL ETC. · Niyam