Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 1962

Supreme Court of India · 1962-07-24

BUDHU RAM vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Citation / case number
SC 1960/97
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BUDHU RAM
Respondent
STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Assistant Settlement Officer was not required to file a complaint under Section 195(1)(c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the prosecution of the appellant, as he only produced an attested copy of a forged document, not the original. The Court clarified that Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code penalizes the use of a forged document as genuine, and the production of a copy amounts to such use. The conviction under Sections 471 and 420 IPC was upheld, affirming the lower courts' decisions.

BUDHU RAM vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN · Niyam