Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1962

Supreme Court of India · 1962-12-12

P. V. GODBOLE vs JAGANNATH FAKIRCHAND

Citation / case number
SC 1960/233
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
P. V. GODBOLE
Respondent
JAGANNATH FAKIRCHAND
Author
DAS, S.K.,KAPURL.,SARKAR, A.K.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,DAYAL, RAGHUBAR
Bench
DAS, S.K.,KAPUR, J.L.,SARKAR, A.K.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,DAYAL, RAGHUBAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the proceedings initiated under Section 34(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for the assessment years 1944-45, 1945-46, and 1946-47 were barred by limitation as per Section 34(3). The Court held that the second proviso to Section 34(3), introduced by the Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1953, did not revive the power to assess income that had already become barred. Additionally, the second proviso was deemed unconstitutional for violating Article 14 of the Constitution, as per the dissenting opinion of Justice Sarkar.

P. V. GODBOLE vs JAGANNATH FAKIRCHAND · Niyam