ANIYOTH KUNHAMINA UMMA vs MINISTRY OF REHABILITATION ANDOTHERS

The Supreme Court held that the petitioner's application under Article 32 of the Constitution was incompetent as it did not raise any question of violation of fundamental rights under Articles 19(1)(f) and 31. The Court found that the decision declaring the petitioner's husband as an evacuee and the property as evacuee property had become final, negating the existence of any alleged right. The Court emphasized that unless the prior decision was declared a nullity, the petitioner could not claim infringement of her fundamental rights.