Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1961

Supreme Court of India · 1961-03-14

RAMAVATAR BUDHAIPRASAD ETC. vs ASSISTANT SALES TAX OFFICER, AKOLA

Citation / case number
SC 1958/78
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAMAVATAR BUDHAIPRASAD ETC.
Respondent
ASSISTANT SALES TAX OFFICER, AKOLA
Bench
KAPUR, J.L.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 6 of the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947, betel leaves are taxable as they were explicitly removed from the exemption list in the Second Schedule. The Court interpreted 'vegetables' in its popular sense, affirming that the legislative intent was to include betel leaves under taxable items. The petitions challenging the sales tax assessment were dismissed, upholding the tax imposition on betel leaves.

RAMAVATAR BUDHAIPRASAD ETC. vs ASSISTANT SALES TAX OFFICER, AKOLA · Niyam