Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1961

Supreme Court of India · 1961-01-20

BHAGWATI SARAN AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH.

Citation / case number
SC 1959/222
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BHAGWATI SARAN AND ANOTHER
Respondent
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH.
Bench
SINHA, BHUVNESHWAR P.(CJ),DAS, S.K.,SARKAR, A.K.,AYYANGAR, N. RAJAGOPALA,MUDHOLKAR, J.R.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the notification fixing maximum prices under Clause 11-B(i) of the Iron and Steel (Control of Production and Distribution) Order, 1941, stating it was intra vires and did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court clarified that differentiation between 'controlled stockholders' and 'registered stockholders' does not constitute discrimination unless shown to be unfair or irrational. Furthermore, the police report met the requirements of Section 11 of the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946, as it sufficiently designated the contravention without needing exhaustive details for prosecution.

BHAGWATI SARAN AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH. · Niyam