Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1960

Supreme Court of India · 1960-10-18

M/S. TUNGABHADRA INDUSTRIES LTD. vs THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, KURNOOL.

Citation / case number
SC 1958/27
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. TUNGABHADRA INDUSTRIES LTD.
Respondent
THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, KURNOOL.
Author
DAS, S.K.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,GUPTA, K.C. DAS,SHAHC.,AYYANGAR, N. RAJAGOPALA
Bench
DAS, S.K.,HIDAYATULLAH, M.,GUPTA, K.C. DAS,SHAH, J.C.,AYYANGAR, N. RAJAGOPALA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that hydrogenated groundnut oil, or Vanaspati, qualifies as 'groundnut oil' under Rule 18(2) of the Madras General Sales Tax (Turnover and Assessment) Rules, 1939. The Court held that the processing of groundnut oil into hydrogenated oil does not change its essential nature as it remains derived from groundnuts and retains its character as oil. Consequently, the appellant is entitled to deduct the purchase price of groundnuts from the sale proceeds of hydrogenated oil for tax assessment purposes.

M/S. TUNGABHADRA INDUSTRIES LTD. vs THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, KURNOOL. · Niyam