Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1960

Supreme Court of India · 1960-11-07

M. PENTIAH AND OTHERS vs MUDDALA VEERAMALLAPPA AND OTHERS.

Citation / case number
SC 1960/29
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M. PENTIAH AND OTHERS
Respondent
MUDDALA VEERAMALLAPPA AND OTHERS.
Author
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B.,SARKAR, A.K.,SUBBARAO, K.,WANCHOO, K.N.,MUDHOLKARR.
Bench
GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B.,SARKAR, A.K.,SUBBARAO, K.,WANCHOO, K.N.,MUDHOLKAR, J.R.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the term 'committee' in Section 320 of the Hyderabad District Municipalities Act, 1956 does not refer to a committee elected under the Act, thus the three-year term prescribed by Section 34 is inapplicable. The Court interpreted the Act's provisions, concluding that Section 320 serves as a transitory provision and does not intend to perpetuate committees from the repealed Act. Consequently, the appellants' challenge to the sales of municipal land by the old committee was dismissed, affirming the High Court's ruling.

M. PENTIAH AND OTHERS vs MUDDALA VEERAMALLAPPA AND OTHERS. · Niyam