MAHARAJA PRAVIR CHANDRA BHANJ DEO KAKATIYA vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

The Supreme Court ruled that the appellant, recognized as a Ruler under Article 366(22) of the Constitution, was an ex-Ruler for the purposes of the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950. The Court held that he fell within the definition of 'proprietor' as per the Act, thus affirming the resumption of certain lands by the respondent. The term 'maufidar' was interpreted broadly, allowing for the inclusion of landholders exempt from rent or tax, confirming the appellant's status as such.