Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 1960

Supreme Court of India · 1960-01-21

THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON,FATEHGARH vs RAM MANOHAR LOHIA

Citation / case number
SC 1956/22
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON,FATEHGARH
Respondent
RAM MANOHAR LOHIA
Author
SINHA, BHUVNESHWAR P.(),GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B.,SUBBARAO, K.,GUPTA, K.C. DAS,SHAHC.
Bench
SINHA, BHUVNESHWAR P.(CJ),GAJENDRAGADKAR, P.B.,SUBBARAO, K.,GUPTA, K.C. DAS,SHAH, J.C.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Section 3 of the U.P. Special Powers Act, 1932, which penalizes instigating individuals not to pay liabilities, is unconstitutional as it violates Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that restrictions on freedom of speech must have a reasonable relation to public order and cannot be overly broad or hypothetical. The High Court's decision in favor of the appellant was upheld, affirming that the section does not embody reasonable restrictions as required under Article 19(2).

THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON,FATEHGARH vs RAM MANOHAR LOHIA · Niyam