Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 1960

Supreme Court of India · 1960-08-16

DIRECTOR OF RATIONING AND DISTRIBUTION vs THE CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA AND OTHERS

Citation / case number
SC 1956/7
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DIRECTOR OF RATIONING AND DISTRIBUTION
Respondent
THE CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA AND OTHERS
Author
SINHA, BHUVNESHWAR P.(),IMAM, SYED JAFFER,SARKAR, A.K.,WANCHOO, K.N.,SHAHC.
Bench
SINHA, BHUVNESHWAR P.(CJ),IMAM, SYED JAFFER,SARKAR, A.K.,WANCHOO, K.N.,SHAH, J.C.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the State is not bound by the provisions of Section 386(1)(a) of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923, unless expressly stated or implied. The High Court's ruling that the Government was bound by statute was upheld, but the Court distinguished the Privy Council's decision in L.R. 73 I.A. 271, affirming that the legal position remains unchanged post-Constitution. The appellant was acquitted of the charges for contravening the Act, as the statute did not apply to the State.

DIRECTOR OF RATIONING AND DISTRIBUTION vs THE CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA AND OTHERS · Niyam