Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1957

Supreme Court of India · 1957-10-31

LEO ROY FREY vs THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL,AMRITSAR, AND ANOTHER(an

Citation / case number
SC 1957/60145
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
LEO ROY FREY
Respondent
THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL,AMRITSAR, AND ANOTHER(an
Bench
DAS, SUDHI RANJAN (CJ),AIYYAR, T.L. VENKATARAMA,DAS, S.K.,SARKAR, A.K.,BOSE, VIVIAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the petitioners, found guilty under Section 167(8) of the Sea Customs Act, could not invoke Article 20(2) of the Constitution to avoid prosecution for criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC after penalties were imposed. The Court clarified that the judicial nature of the Collector's actions does not prevent further punishment under other laws. The petitions for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus were dismissed, affirming that separate charges for conspiracy are valid and do not violate double jeopardy protections.

LEO ROY FREY vs THE SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL,AMRITSAR, AND ANOTHER(an · Niyam