Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1957

Supreme Court of India · 1957-03-07

THE STATE OF BOMBAY vs SALAT PRAGJI KARAMSI

Citation / case number
SC 1955/99
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE OF BOMBAY
Respondent
SALAT PRAGJI KARAMSI
Bench
BHAGWATI, NATWARLAL H.,JAGANNADHADAS, B.,IMAM, SYED JAFFER,MENON, P. GOVINDA,KAPUR, J.L.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act (Bom. IV of 1887) was validly extended to Kutch under the Kutch (Application of Laws) Order, 1949, but required a notification to be in force in specific areas. The Court clarified that the Chief Commissioner of Kutch had the authority to issue such a notification, which was valid and effective. Consequently, the conviction under Section 12(a) of the Bombay Act was upheld, as the Act was applicable in Kutch following the proper notification process.

THE STATE OF BOMBAY vs SALAT PRAGJI KARAMSI · Niyam