Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1957

Supreme Court of India · 1957-04-05

RAMJI LAL MODI vs THE STATE OF U.P.

Citation / case number
SC 1956/107
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAMJI LAL MODI
Respondent
THE STATE OF U.P.
Author
DAS, SUDHI RANJAN (),IMAM, SYED JAFFER,DAS, S.K.,MENON, P. GOVINDA,SARKAR, A.K.
Bench
DAS, SUDHI RANJAN (CJ),IMAM, SYED JAFFER,DAS, S.K.,MENON, P. GOVINDA,SARKAR, A.K.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code, affirming that it does not violate the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The Court reasoned that the restrictions imposed by Section 295A are justified under Article 19(2) as they serve to maintain public order, which is a permissible limitation on the right to free speech. The petitioner's conviction under this section was therefore upheld, confirming that laws against insult to religion are necessary to prevent public disorder.

RAMJI LAL MODI vs THE STATE OF U.P. · Niyam