Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1957

Supreme Court of India · 1957-04-11

THE COLLECTOR OF MALABAR vs ERIMAL EBRAHIM HAJEE

Citation / case number
SC 1954/90282
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE COLLECTOR OF MALABAR
Respondent
ERIMAL EBRAHIM HAJEE
Author
DAS, SUDHI RANJAN (),IMAM, SYED JAFFER,DAS, S.K.,MENON, P. GOVINDA,SARKAR, A.K.
Bench
DAS, SUDHI RANJAN (CJ),IMAM, SYED JAFFER,DAS, S.K.,MENON, P. GOVINDA,SARKAR, A.K.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 46(2) of the Indian Income Tax Act and Section 48 of the Madras Revenue Recovery Act, ruling that they do not violate Articles 14, 19, 21, and 22 of the Constitution. The Court clarified that an arrest for civil debt under these provisions is lawful if the Collector has reason to believe the defaulter is willfully withholding payment. The Court affirmed that such an arrest does not require a prior hearing and is not punitive but a recovery mechanism for tax arrears.

THE COLLECTOR OF MALABAR vs ERIMAL EBRAHIM HAJEE · Niyam