Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1956

Supreme Court of India · 1956-09-17

KESHAV NILKANTH JOGLEKAR vs THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, GREATERBOMBAY(and connected pe

Citation / case number
SC 1956/130
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KESHAV NILKANTH JOGLEKAR
Respondent
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, GREATERBOMBAY(and connected pe
Bench
DAS, SUDHI RANJAN (CJ),AIYYAR, T.L. VENKATARAMA,SINHA, BHUVNESHWAR P.,DAS, S.K.,MENON, P. GOVINDA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 3(3) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, which mandates that a detention order must be reported 'forthwith' to the State Government. The Court held that 'forthwith' does not imply an absolute time frame but must be understood in the context of the circumstances surrounding the case. The delay in reporting was deemed justifiable as it was caused by factors largely attributable to the petitioners, thus validating the detention order despite the delay in communication.

KESHAV NILKANTH JOGLEKAR vs THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, GREATERBOMBAY(and connected pe · Niyam