Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1956

Supreme Court of India · 1956-03-14

VEMIREDDY SATYANARAYAN REDDY AND THREE OTHERS vs THE STATE OF HYDERABAD.

Citation / case number
SC 1955/129
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VEMIREDDY SATYANARAYAN REDDY AND THREE OTHERS
Respondent
THE STATE OF HYDERABAD.
Bench
AIYAR, N. CHANDRASEKHARA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court clarified that mere presence at the scene of a crime does not render an individual an accomplice unless they actively aid or abet the crime, as established in the judgment. The Court emphasized that corroboration of a single witness's testimony must connect the accused to the crime, which can be satisfied through circumstantial evidence. The Court upheld the conviction of the appellants for murder under the relevant provisions, affirming the need for corroborative evidence while distinguishing between principal and accessory roles in criminal acts.

VEMIREDDY SATYANARAYAN REDDY AND THREE OTHERS vs THE STATE OF HYDERABAD. · Niyam