Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 1954

Supreme Court of India · 1954-11-01

NAVINCHANDRA MAFATLAL vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,BOMBAY CITY.

Citation / case number
SC 1952/9
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NAVINCHANDRA MAFATLAL
Respondent
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,BOMBAY CITY.
Bench
MAHAJAN, MEHAR CHAND (CJ),DAS, SUDHI RANJAN,HASAN, GHULAM,BHAGWATI, NATWARLAL H.,AIYYAR, T.L. VENKATARAMA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that Section 12-B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, which imposes tax on 'Capital gains', is not ultra vires the Government of India Act, 1935. The Court held that 'Capital gains' falls within the definition of 'income' as per item No. 54 of List I of the Seventh Schedule of the Government of India Act, 1935. It emphasized that the interpretation of 'income' should be broad and in its ordinary grammatical sense, rejecting the notion of a strict separation between income and capital gains.

NAVINCHANDRA MAFATLAL vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,BOMBAY CITY. · Niyam