Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 1954

Supreme Court of India · 1954-05-27

Mr. vs THE HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURT

Citation / case number
SC 1954/90364
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Mr.
Respondent
THE HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURT
Author
MUKHERJEA, B.K.,DAS, SUDHI RANJAN,BOSE, VIVIAN,HASAN, GHULAM,JAGANNADHADAS, B.
Bench
MUKHERJEA, B.K.,DAS, SUDHI RANJAN,BOSE, VIVIAN,HASAN, GHULAM,JAGANNADHADAS, B.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that an order under Section 10(2) of the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926, can be oral and does not require a written form. The Court affirmed that the High Court has the authority to refer a case on its own motion as per the provisions of the Act. The judgment clarified that while a record of the order is necessary, it can be maintained through other means, such as letters from court officials, thus validating the proceedings before the Tribunal.

Mr. vs THE HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURT · Niyam