Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1954

Supreme Court of India · 1954-03-16

HIMMATLAL HARILAL MEHTAV vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHE

Citation / case number
SC 1952/25
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HIMMATLAL HARILAL MEHTAV
Respondent
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHE
Bench
MAHAJAN, MEHAR CHAND (CJ),MUKHERJEA, B.K.,DAS, SUDHI RANJAN,BOSE, VIVIAN,HASAN, GHULAM

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Explanation II to Section 2(g) of the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act (Act XXI of 1947), as amended by Act XVI of 1949, is ultra vires the State Legislature. The Court established that a threat by the State to realize tax without legal authority infringes the fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, allowing the aggrieved party to seek relief under Article 226. The Court found that the requirement for assesses to deposit the entire tax before obtaining relief does not provide an adequate alternative remedy.

HIMMATLAL HARILAL MEHTAV vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHE · Niyam