Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 1954

Supreme Court of India · 1954-03-09

SRI SRI SRI KISHORE CHANDRA SINGH DEO vs BABU GANESH PRASAD BHAGAT AND OTHERS.

Citation / case number
SC 1949/23
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SRI SRI SRI KISHORE CHANDRA SINGH DEO
Respondent
BABU GANESH PRASAD BHAGAT AND OTHERS.
Bench
AIYYAR, T.L. VENKATARAMA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted the term 'resides' in Section 33(1)(a) of the Indian Registration Act, 1908, to encompass both permanent and temporary residence, emphasizing that ownership of the residence is not a prerequisite. It held that a power-of-attorney does not require registration under Section 32(c) but must be executed and authenticated by the Registrar, and any mistaken endorsement regarding registration does not invalidate the authentication. Furthermore, the Court ruled that a Registrar's decision under Section 33(1) regarding an applicant's bodily infirmity is procedural and cannot be questioned in court, affirming the Registrar's exclusive jurisdiction in such matters.

SRI SRI SRI KISHORE CHANDRA SINGH DEO vs BABU GANESH PRASAD BHAGAT AND OTHERS. · Niyam