Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 1953

Supreme Court of India · 1953-09-23

SOHAN PATHAK AND SONS vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P.

Citation / case number
SC 1952/53
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SOHAN PATHAK AND SONS
Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P.
Bench
SASTRI, M. PATANJALI (CJ),MUKHERJEA, B.K.,BOSE, VIVIAN,HASAN, GHULAM,JAGANNADHADAS, B.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that under Sections 4 and 5 of the Excess Profits Tax Act, a business that did not earn profits during the relevant chargeable accounting period cannot be taxed as a Hindu undivided family. The Court held that the partial partition of the brocade business was an artificial transaction aimed at tax avoidance, and thus, the business was deemed discontinued. Consequently, the provisions of Section 10-A of the Act could not apply as the business was not legally treated as continuing during the relevant periods.

SOHAN PATHAK AND SONS vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, U.P. · Niyam