Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 1953

Supreme Court of India · 1953-10-05

HABEEB MOHAMMAD vs THE STATE OF HYDERABAD.

Citation / case number
SC 1952/50
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HABEEB MOHAMMAD
Respondent
THE STATE OF HYDERABAD.
Bench
MAHAJAN, MEHR CHAND

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the prosecution must call essential witnesses to substantiate its case, as their absence can lead to adverse inferences regarding the fairness of the trial. In this case, the failure to examine the Deputy Commissioner of Police, a key eyewitness, resulted in a lack of a fair trial, leading to the conviction being set aside. The Court emphasized that police diaries should not be used to confirm evidence but only to aid in inquiries, and it would intervene under Article 136 if a trial was not fair and proper.

HABEEB MOHAMMAD vs THE STATE OF HYDERABAD. · Niyam