Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1953

Supreme Court of India · 1953-12-16

D. R. MADHAVAKRISHNAIAH vs THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BANGALORE.

Citation / case number
SC 1953/1469
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
D. R. MADHAVAKRISHNAIAH
Respondent
THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BANGALORE.
Bench
SASTRI, M. PATANJALI (CJ),MAHAJAN, MEHR CHAND,DAS, SUDHI RANJAN,HASAN, GHULAM,JAGANNADHADAS, B.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the proviso to Section 13 of the Indian Finance Act, 1950, allowing the Income-tax Officer to assess income-tax and super-tax on income accrued prior to April 1, 1950, in Mysore. The Court ruled that Parliament had the power to legislate retrospectively concerning tax laws and that Article 277 of the Constitution does not prevent Parliament from authorizing the levy of taxes through officers appointed under the Indian Income-tax Act. The appeals challenging the jurisdiction of the Income-tax Officer were dismissed.

D. R. MADHAVAKRISHNAIAH vs THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BANGALORE. · Niyam