Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 1953

Supreme Court of India · 1953-12-18

BABURAO SHANTARAM MORE vs THE BOMBAY HOUSING BOARD ANDANOTHER.,

Citation / case number
SC 1952/34
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BABURAO SHANTARAM MORE
Respondent
THE BOMBAY HOUSING BOARD ANDANOTHER.,
Bench
SASTRI, M. PATANJALI (CJ),DAS, SUDHI RANJAN,BOSE, VIVIAN,HASAN, GHULAM,JAGANNADHADAS, B.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that neither Section 4 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 nor the newly inserted Section 3-A in the Bombay Housing Board Act, 1948 by the Bombay Housing Board (Amendment) Act, 1951 is ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The Court established that the provisions in question do not violate the right to equality as enshrined in the Constitution. Consequently, the petition challenging the validity of these provisions was dismissed.

BABURAO SHANTARAM MORE vs THE BOMBAY HOUSING BOARD ANDANOTHER., · Niyam