Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 1953

Supreme Court of India · 1953-04-17

MAQBOOL HUSSAIN vs THE STATE OF BOMBAY.JAGJIT SINGHV.THE STATE OF PUNJAB.VIDY

Citation / case number
SC 1952/57
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAQBOOL HUSSAIN
Respondent
THE STATE OF BOMBAY.JAGJIT SINGHV.THE STATE OF PUNJAB.VIDY
Bench
SASTRI, M. PATANJALI (CJ),MUKHERJEA, B.K.,DAS, SUDHI RANJAN,HASAN, GHULAM,BHAGWATI, NATWARLAL H.

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Article 20(2) of the Constitution, clarifying that 'prosecution' refers to criminal proceedings before a court. It held that proceedings by Sea Customs Authorities under Section 167 of the Sea Customs Act do not constitute a 'prosecution' that bars subsequent prosecution under Section 23 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. Additionally, it ruled that actions taken by the Jail Superintendent under the Punjab Communist Detenus Rules do not amount to prosecution, allowing for further prosecution under the Indian Penal Code for jail offences.

MAQBOOL HUSSAIN vs THE STATE OF BOMBAY.JAGJIT SINGHV.THE STATE OF PUNJAB.VIDY · Niyam