Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 1952

Supreme Court of India · 1952-02-01

W.H. KING vs REPUBLIC OF INDIA AND ANOTHER.

Citation / case number
SC 1951/67
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
W.H. KING
Respondent
REPUBLIC OF INDIA AND ANOTHER.
Bench
SASTRI, M. PATANJALI (CJ),MAHAJAN, MEHR CHAND,MUKHERJEA, B.K.,DAS, SUDHI RANJAN,AIYAR, N. CHANDRASEKHARA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 19 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, which prohibits tenants from receiving any consideration for relinquishing their tenancy. The Court held that the act of handing over possession of a flat in exchange for 'pugree' did not constitute a relinquishment of tenancy as defined by the statute. Consequently, the conviction of the tenant under Section 19(2) was reversed, emphasizing the distinction between assignment and relinquishment of tenancy rights.

W.H. KING vs REPUBLIC OF INDIA AND ANOTHER. · Niyam