YOKESVARAN K vs UNION OF INDIA

Judgment text excerpt

$~100 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 12.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 844/2026 YOKESVARAN K .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Baisala, Mr. Dhananjay Singh, Mr. Kavesh Bidhuri, Mr. Sourabh Soni and Mr. Shobhit Anand, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Suhail Malik, SPC, Mr. Dev Pratap Shahi, GP, Mr. Aqib Zaman, Adv. and Mr. Santosh Kumar, Asst. Comdt., Mr. Atul Kumar, SI and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Inspector, CISF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA 1. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the directions contained in the order dated 23.03.2026, passed in W.P.(C) 3682/2026. The said order reads as under: “3. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:- “i. A direction to the Standing Screening Committee of the Respondent/CISF at CISF Headquarters, New Delhi to decide the correctness/antecedents of the documents produced by Petitioner, showing proof in support of the fact that no case/FIR is pending against them, within Two weeks, as no cases, whatsoever, are pending against the Petitioner herein; and Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ROHIT CONT.CAS(C) 844/2026 Page 1 of 2 KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:18.05.2026 11:37:44 ii. Pass any such other or further order(s) in the favor of the Petitioner as deemed fit in the given fact and circumstances and in the interest of justice.” 4. In view of the only prayer made by the petitioner in the writ petition, we direct that the Standing Screening Committee of the Respondent/CISF at CISF Headquarters, New Delhi shall decide the correctness/antecedents of the documents produced by the petitioner within six weeks from today and communicate the decision to the petitioner. 5. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of.” 2. Learned counsel for the petiti