YES BANK LTD vs STATE OF HARYANA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 155 CWP-13114-2026 Date of Decision: 05.05.2026 YES BANK LTD ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been filed inter alia for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.3 to provide assistance in handing over the physical possession of the secured asset. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that order dated 29.01.2026 (Annexure P-9) has been passed by Additional District Magistrate, Gurugram under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, ‘SARFAESI Act’), but despite a lapse of more than three months, physical possession of the secured asset has not been delivered. 3. Advance copy of the petition has been served upon the official respondents. 4. On asking, State counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondents-State. He does not have any instructions. 5. Having heard counsel for parties and keeping in view