YASHPAL ETC. vs ROSHAN KAUR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (228) RSA-2712-2002 (O&M) Date of Decision:-11.05.2026 YASHPAL AND OTHERS … Appellants Versus RESHAM KAUR ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Rajesh Tushar, Advocate for Mr. Roshan Lal Sharma, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. B.S. Bhinder, Advocate for the respondent. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for both the parties submitted that they have no instructions from their clients. This is a suit for permanent injunction instituted in the year 1994. 2. As such, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the case on the docket, indefinitely. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. As a natural corollary, since the main case stands dismissed for want of prosecution of, all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, as no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping them pending. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) th 11 May, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.05.11 23:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document