Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Punjab and Haryana High Court · 2026-05-04

YASH vs STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH

Citation / case number
CRM-M 12056/2026
Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Petitioner
YASH
Respondent
STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

CRM-M-12056-2026 & CRM-M-4042-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 231 CRM-M-12056-2026 Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 Yash ..... Petitioner Versus State of UT, Chandigarh .......Respondent 231a CRM-M-4042-2026 Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 Arjun ..... Petitioner Versus State of UT, Chandigarh .......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner in CRM-M-12056-2026. Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Saransh Sabharwal, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-4042-2026. Mr. Satish Kumar, Addl. PP, UT, Chandigarh assisted by ASI Pawan Kumar. Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (ORAL) 1. By this order, the two above-mentioned petitions are disposed of, both having arisen out of the same FIR. 2. Petitioners have approached this Court by way of filing the present petitions praying for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.88 dated 09.05.2024, registered under Section 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 506, 307 and 34 IPC (Section 302 IPC added lateron), at Police Station Sector 31, Chandigarh. 3. As per the facts of the case the present case was registered on the statement of complainant, namely, Roop Lal @ Nitin Kumar, father