Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-11

WRIT - C No. 17237 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 17237 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 17237 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17237 of 2026 Ajit Singh Atri And 17 Others .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey, Ajay Mishra, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akanksha Gaur, Paras Nath Rai Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Shri Krishna Mishra, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Shivam Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri Paras Nath Rai, learned Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India; Sri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Ms. Akanksha Gaur, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 3/NHAI. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred seeking following reliefs : "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the award dated 10.03.2025 passed by the respondent No. 5 and consequential order dated 31.01.2026 passed by the respondent No.4 in Case No. 13786 of 2025 (Shishupal Singh v. N.H.A.I.) (Annexure Nos. 1 & 3 to the writ petition respectively). II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents No.

WRIT - C No. 17237 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam