Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-13

WRIT - B No. 2028 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 2028 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 2028 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 2028 of 2026 Jitendra Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Court No. - 55 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent and Sri Amit Gupta, holding brief of Sri B. K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent Gaon Sabha. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the orders of respondent nos.2 and 3, dated 20.10.2022 and 08.02.2017, respectively, arising out of proceedings under Section 33/39 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901. 3. Record reveals that petitioner that the predecessor in interest of the petitioner was recorded during consolidation proceedings in CH Form-11 under Section 9A(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. However, while preparation of the final records the land in dispute was recorded as Banjar. The petitioner moved an application before the concerned Tehsildar on 06.09.2005 to correct the revenue records, which was allowed by the order da

WRIT - B No. 2028 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam