Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-05-13

WRIT - A No. 7220 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 7220 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 7220 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 7220 of 2026 Babu Ram .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Archana Singh, Bramh Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the parties. 2. The order dated 07.01.2026 passed by the respondent No.3/Senior Superintendent of Police (Railway), Prayagraj is under challenge by which the salary of the petitioner has been revised & reduced with effect from 01.07.2011 is under challenge. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been superannuated from his service on 30.11.2025 and after retirement, the order impugned has been passed by which the salary of the petitioner has been revised & reduced retrospectively with effect from 01.07.2011. It is argued that before passing the aforesaid order, no notice or opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner. 4. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that recovery could not be sought against the petitioner after his retirement and that too on the ground that som

WRIT - A No. 7220 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam