VIZWISE COMMERCE PVT LTD vs MR SANJEEV BANSAL

Judgment text excerpt

$~98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 25.05.2026 + CS(OS) 58/2026 VIZWISE COMMERCE PVT LTD .....Plaintiff Through: versus MR SANJEEV BANSAL .....Defendant Through: Defendant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN AVNEESH JHINGAN, J. (ORAL) CS(OS) 58/2026 1. This suit is filed by the plaintiff with the following prayers: “a) Pass a decree of possession in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant in respect to the Suit Premises being 2nd Floor of S-337, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi-110048 as shown in Red Color in the Site Plan filed alongwith the Suit; b) Pass a decree of damages of Rs. 98,40,000/- and further damages as prayed in the Plaint alongwith interest as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant; c) Award the cost of the present proceedings in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant; and/ or” I.A. 14811/2026 & I.A. 14812/2026 2. The application under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short „CPC‟) is filed by the applicant/defendant seeking rejection of the suit. 3. The plaintiff filed the suit seeking possession and damages in respect of the second floor of the property bearing no. S-337, Greater Kailash Part- Signature Not Verified Signed By:HONEY ARORA CS(OS) 58/2026 Page 1 of 5 Signing Date:26.05.2026 18:31:43 1, New Delhi (for short „suit property‟). 4. Mr. Sanjeev Bansal, the applicant appears in person and insists upon addressing and assisting the Court personally and has rejected the offer made to him of a legal aid counsel. 5. The applicant appearing in person submits that the plaint wrongly mentions that the applicant is in possession of the second floor of the suit property whereas actually th